Renewal
Theology
Media
Published Online Books
A Theological Pilgrimage
The Gift of the Holy Spirit Today
Ten Teachings
The Pentecostal Reality
Published Online Writings
Prophecy by the Book
Scripture: God's Written Word
The Holy Spirit in the Early Church
Other Writings
|
A Theological Pilgrimage
Chapter 4 - The Person and Work of the Holy Spirit
With Special Reference to "The Baptism in the
Holy Spirit" Excerpts from a report adopted by the General Assembly
of the
former Presbyterian Church, U.S. (Southern), in 19711
I. Certain Contemporary Experiences of the Spirit
A. There are a number of people in historic Protestant churches- -and
most recently in the Roman Catholic Church- -who have had an experience
which they call "the baptism of (with, in) the Holy Spirit,"
or sometimes "the filling of (with) the Holy Spirit."
This experience has been so meaningful and vivid to those who
have gone through it that they have difficulty putting it into
words: "a new relationship, a deeper encounter, a closer
walk." Many speak of it primarily as an extraordinary sense
of God's reality and presence, and lay claim to a praise and adoration
of God hitherto unknown to them. At the same time they often testify
to a new bond of community with those who have had the same experience,
and a heightened desire and capacity to bear witness to the gospel.
In all aspects of life they claim a deeper love, joy, and peace.
Frequently they testify to a multiplicity of "charismata,"
such as speaking in tongues, prophecy, healing, and so on. Many
claim that speaking in tongues was the primary manifestation of
their "filling" or "baptism," for it has been
either an immediate accompaniment of their experience or has followed
some time later. They usually disclaim an interest in the spectacular
as such; rather, their testimony is to the reality of God, a deeper
awareness of His presence, and the wonder that the Holy Spirit
has filled their being.
As these people seek to understand what has happened to them,
they generally speak of it as an occurrence within their Christian
life. Usually they think of themselves as having been believers
for a long time; hence, they do not interpret this experience
as entrance into faith but as something beyond. Sometimes they
speak of salvation and being "filled with the Spirit."
They claim that both could (and sometimes do) occur at the same
moment, but for most of them there has been a separation in time.
Frequently this "baptism with the Spirit" has occurred
after the laying on of hands; but this is not true in all cases.
For most of these people the testimony is that- -with or without
the laying on of hands- -the experience occurred after extended
prayer and seeking. Some speak of this event as a transition within
their Christian experience, from the state of Christ's (or the
Spirit's) being with them to His being in them. Others say that
the transition is rather to be understood as a fuller realization
of what was already within them. In any case, these people feel
sure that they have entered into a new and exciting life in the
Spirit.
B. The events which we have enumerated have raised some critical
problems for our Church, and especially for those congregations
in which the events have occurred. In the first place, we have
tended to stress the work of the Spirit in the life of the believer
as uniting the believer to Christ and thereby bringing to him
God's grace in salvation. Justification has been viewed as the
initial work of the Spirit in applying to man the benefits of
Christ's work, and sanctification as the ongoing work of the Spirit
in completing the divine purpose by transforming a human life
more and more into the likeness of Jesus Christ. But in this contemporary
experience of the Spirit there seems to be testimony to an additional
working of the Spirit that goes beyond the initiation of Christian
life (justification) and its progress (sanctification)- -a "baptism"
or "filling" with the Holy Spirit. The critical question
here is how, in the light of the Biblical witness and the Reformed
tradition, this understanding is to be adjudged.
In the second place, problems of another kind also arise from
the situation to which we have referred. When some members of
a congregation claim special pneumatic experiences, or claim extraordinary
gifts- -e.g., healing, speaking in tongues- -the peace, unity, and
fellowship of the Church may be seriously jeopardized. Differing
views of the Spirit and His work may give rise to a schism between
those who claim a Spirit baptism and those who do not, or between
those who recognize the validity of such claims and those who
do not. Obviously our Church ought to provide some guidance in
these matters where strong differences of opinion may result in
contention and the disruption of the Church's work.
Manifestly, any valid guidance that can be given on this, or on
any other subject, must be derived from the teachings of Scripture,
and must be evaluated in the light of the Standards of our church.
We shall therefore attempt to sketch what the Old and the New
Testaments have to say with regard to the Spirit, and then to
examine the teachings of the Confession of Faith and the Catechisms,
before proceeding to draw conclusions.2
V Concluding Observations
An evaluation of contemporary events involving a "baptism
of the Holy Spirit" must begin, as the structure of the report
implies, with the guidance furnished us by the Scriptures. At
the same time we are called upon to give serious heed to the doctrinal
Standards3 of our denomination. Likewise it is imperative that
we seek to understand what is deeply involved, and at stake for
those who claim to have had such a "baptism" within
their Christian experience, and particular "charismatic"
manifestations. The Scriptures remain our primary source; yet
our understanding of Scripture depends upon the illumination provided
by the Spirit Himself.
Our study of the Old and New Testaments, however, has revealed
no single consistent doctrine of the Spirit which is now immediately
applicable to the contemporary situation; nor has it furnished
us with a simple straight line of doctrinal development in this
regard. Moreover, we must avoid the temptation to improve on the
concept of the Spirit through any speculative theory drawn from
other sources. Hence, our point of departure in this task can
be no other than the New Testament's close identification of the
Spirit with Jesus Christ. As Christians we must be guided first
of all by God's self-revelation in Christ, testing our understanding
by the Scripture's testimony to Him who is our Lord.
A. As we seek to give an expression of our faith in the Holy Spirit
that will be an aid in comprehending the experiences which have
prompted the present study, there are several basic principles
which we must bear in mind. First, as the Scriptures repeatedly
affirm, the Holy Spirit is the Spirit of the holy God, the God
of the Bible. All our speech about the Holy Spirit is therefore
speech about God. We shall make no attempt to define the concept
of "spirit" in general and then move to an understanding
of the Holy Spirit based on our ideas about the essential properties
or characteristics of "spirit." Rather, our task is
to discern the meaning of God's action, in the person of His Spirit,
in the lives of His people.
Second, as the New Testament makes clear, and as Calvin aptly
reminds us (Institutes, 3.1.4), there is no understanding of the
Spirit apart from faith. This means that all our statements about
the Holy Spirit are in essence affirmations of faith. They are
not "factual" statements in the sense that they purport
to give objective data or information which may then be tested
for accuracy by scientific means. In speaking of the Holy Spirit
we speak from faith to faith.
Third, since the Holy Spirit is the spirit of the God whom we
know only through Jesus Christ, we are compelled, in regard to
the contemporary spiritual phenomena, to "test the spirits
to see whether they are of God" by the measure of their confession
of Jesus Christ (1 John 4:1-3). Nothing that contradicts what
we see in Christ can rightly be regarded as the activity of the
Spirit; on the other hand, whatever bears witness to Christ and
His work of the redemption of mankind exhibits the incontrovertible
evidence of the Spirit's presence.
B. With the foregoing principles in mind, and with constant reference
to the Biblical teachings, the Standards of our Church, and the
contemporary situation, the Permanent Theological Committee offers
the following statement for the guidance of the Assembly.
1. The greatest emphasis in the Bible, and the most prominent
aspect of our Reformed tradition, is to be found in the work of
the Spirit in bestowing upon man all the benefits of God which
come to him in Jesus Christ. Faith in Jesus Christ is the way
whereby all benefits are received, such as justification, sanctification,
and eternal life (1 Cor. 6:11; John 3:16; Confession of Faith,
14.2), and through the Holy Spirit this salvation is a reality.
2. The Holy Spirit accordingly dwells in all who thus believe.
If anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he does not belong
to Him (Rom. 8:9). Thus it is impossible to speak of a transition
within Christian existence from the state of Spirit's being with
to being in. The Spirit indwells all Christians.
3. Baptism with water is a means of grace whereby the grace of
salvation is not only offered but conferred by the Holy Spirit
(Confession, 30.6). However, according to the Confession, the
significance of baptism is not tied to the moment of administration,
for, though God's saving grace is conferred thereby, such grace
may become efficacious at a later time, or it may have become
efficacious earlier. For example, there are those who do not come
to an appropriation of this grace (especially if baptized in infancy)
until a later date. Calvin speaks (particularly regarding infants)
of being "baptized into future repentance and faith"
(Institutes 4.20), and urges that this should fire us with greater
zeal for renewal in later years. From this perspective it is possible
to say that baptism with water may very well be separated from
salvation, or at least from full entrance upon it. Though baptism
is a channel of God's grace, this grace is not automatically efficacious.
Accordingly, there may be special need in the Reformed tradition
to lay stress on later occasions (such as entrance into communicant
membership) on which God's grace may also be appropriated. Reformed
teaching about baptism must be held in creative tension with all
that is also said about the importance of conversion and regeneration,
and the practice of our church should be in harmony therewith.
4. "Baptism with the Holy Spirit," as the Book of Acts
portrays it, is a phrase which refers most often to the empowering
of those who believe to share in the mission of Jesus Christ.
The significance of "baptism with the Spirit" is also
represented in terms such as "outpouring," "falling
upon," "filling," and "receiving," being
for the most part attempts to depict that action of God whereby
believers are enabled to give expression to the gospel through
extraordinary praise, powerful witness, and boldness of action.
Accordingly, those who speak of such a "baptism with the
Spirit," and who give evidence of this special empowering
work of the Spirit, can claim Scriptural support. Further, since
"baptism in the Spirit" may not be at the same time
as baptism with water and/or conversion, we need to be open-minded
toward those today who claim an intervening period of time. If
this experience signifies in some sense a deepening of faith and
awareness of God's presence and power, we may be grateful.
5. We are called upon to recognize a work of the Spirit which
involves the application of special gifts and benefits to the
members of Christ's church. The Confession of Faith suggests this
in Chapter 9.4, where, following the paragraph on the Spirit's
work in redemption, the words, in part, read, "He calls and
anoints ministers for their holy office, qualifies all other officers
in the church for their special work, and imparts various gifts
and graces to its members." Here is a special work of the
Holy Spirit of calling and anointing that is peculiarly related
to the life of the believing community. We would add that it is
important for the church constantly to bear this work of the Holy
Spirit in mind so that there will be a continuing readiness for,
and recognition of, the calling, the qualifying, and the imparting
of the gifts and graces of the Holy Spirit to the community of
faith. Both a fresh confrontation with the biblical record and
contemporary spiritual experience, we believe, are bringing us
into a fuller understanding of the work of the Holy Spirit.
6. The "baptism of the Holy Spirit" may be signified
by certain pneumatic phenomena, such as speaking in tongues and
prophecy (Acts 2:4; 10:46; 19:6). In the Old Testament, as we
have noted, the Spirit is understood at times as an invading power,
a charismatic fury; also it is frequently associated with ecstatic
prophecy. However, since the Spirit came only to certain exceptional
persons, this was quite limited. With the New Testament dispensation
the Spirit is now available to all who believe in Jesus Christ.
Hence such signs of this invading power as ecstatic language and
prophecy could occur with anyone who has experienced this visitation.
Clearly it would be a mistake to say that all upon whom the Spirit
comes must manifest specific pneumatic phenomena. The Spirit usually
manifests Himself in other ways. However, that such extraordinary
manifestations may occur- -and in so doing give evidence of the
Spirit's working- -is quite in accord with the witness of the New
Testament.
7. There may be further bestowal of the Holy Spirit. "Baptism
with the Spirit" signifies the initial outpouring of God's
Spirit wherein the community and/or person is filled with the
presence and power of God. But also there may be later bestowal
in such fashion as o signify implementation of the original event,
whether or not accompanied by pneumatic phenomena (cf. Acts 2:4
with 4:31). This renewed activity of the Spirit ought not to be
designated "baptism" (at least, the New Testament never
uses this term for it), but as "filling," wherein the
empowering Spirit moves to renew the believer and believing community.
8. The bestowal and reception of the Spirit, or the gifts of the
Spirit, does not signify a higher level of spirituality nor ought
it to suggest that some Christians have more of the Holy Spirit
than others. Such expressions as "baptism," "filling,"
and the like point rather to the Spirit's implementing activity;
endowment for the witness to the gospel. The Spirit is active
in all believers, and they may be "filled" with the
Spirit in various ways for the mission of the Church. It should
be added that such expressions as "having" or "filled
with" the Spirit are not to be construed as obviating the
possibility and actuality of growth in grace and knowledge.
9. Both the coming of the Spirit Himself and the various abilities
or charismata which He may bestow upon people are, above all,
to be received as the benefits of God's free grace. Neither the
Spirit, then, nor His gifts may be considered "possessions"
of the believer; he does not own them, nor can he presume that
they are, or will be, at all times (or at any given time) available.
Each occasion on which the Spirit's presence is known or His gifts
made manifest is to be an occasion for new thanksgiving and praise
to God. Hence, there should be no jeopardizing of the peace, unity,
and fellowship of the Church because of special experiences of
the Holy Spirit, but a rejoicing together in all those ways whereby
God leads His people into fuller apprehension of the riches of
His grace.
10. An experience of the Spirit can neither be validated as such,
nor evaluated with respect to its theological significance, by
any scientific (i.e., psychological, sociological, etc.) means.
It is to be acknowledged that such events, just as any other human
events, may become the legitimate objects of scientific inquiry.
But regardless of the scientific conclusions which may be reached,
the question of the theological significance of the phenomena
will remain, and it may be answered only within the context of
the Christian faith. The Corinthians' ability to speak in tongues,
for example, may have a perfectly good psychological explanation;
but whether the Spirit of Jesus Christ was active in the phenomenon
is a question which neither psychology nor any other science can
answer. But this conclusion leads also to the observation that
the extraordinary or unusual nature of an experience (and the
same would apply to gifts) is no criterion by which to judge its
significance for faith. Ecstasy is not in itself an unambiguous
occurrence. Not every dramatic event, experience, or ecstasy is
necessarily a work of the Spirit.
11. It is clear the there is Biblical and Reformed witness concerning
baptism of the Holy Spirit and special endowment of the Holy Spirit
in the believing community. Of course, it is impossible to make
any general pronouncement concerning the validity of particular
claims made, since multiple factors may be at work. But where
there is divisiveness, judgment (expressed or implied) on the
lives of others, an attitude of pride or boasting, etc., the Spirit
of God is not at work. However, where such an experience gives
evidence of an empowering and renewing work of Christ in the life
of the individual and the Church, it may be acknowledged with
gratitude. This means above all that Christ should be glorified,
His own Spirit made manifest in human lives, and the Church edified.
For such evidences of the presence of the Holy Spirit the Church
may rejoice.4
Footnotes
1A complete copy of the report may be found in Presence, Power, Praise: Documents on the Charismatic Renewal, edited by Kilian McDonnell, 1:287-317
2For reasons of space I will omit sections II, III, and IV dealing respectively with the Old Testament, New Testament, and Church Standards. However, those sections are well worth reading because they provide a valuable biblical and ecclesiastical foundation.
3The Westminster Confession of Faith and Catechisms.
4Concluding remark: This report is highly significant in that it officially recognizes a "special empowering work of the Spirit" and that "baptism with the Spirit may not be at the same time as baptism with water and/or conversion" (B. 4 above). Moreover, the report closes quite positively with the statement that "where such an experience gives evidence of an empowering and renewing work of Christ in the life of the individual and the Churcit may be acknowledged with gratitude" (B. 11). This is indeed an extraordinary step ahead for a Presbyterian denomination!
Content Copyright ©1996, 2001 by J. Rodman Williams, Ph.D.
| Preface | Chapter 1 | Chapter 2 | Chapter 3 | Chapter 4 | Chapter 5 | Chapter 6 | Chapter 7 | Chapter 8 | Chapter 9 |
| Chapter 10 | Chapter 11 | Chapter 12 | Chapter 13 | Chapter 14 | Chapter 15 | Chapter 16 | Top |