Ten Teachings
Chapter 4 - Jesus Christ
There is one supremely urgent question in life which every person must answer.
It was asked by Jesus Himself: "But who do you say that I am?" (Matthew
16:15). It is finally not "What do others say?" but "What do
you say?" That alone really counts.
On the surface it is admittedly a strange question. Indeed, coming from the
lips of anyone but Jesus of Nazareth it would seem absurd. "Who am I?"
asked by someone else could not even be taken seriously. "Why, of course,
you are a man, a human being, just like all other human beings-who do you think
you are?" might be the reply. But with this person Jesus we know one cannot
answer so easily, for there is mystery. Yet we know we must answer-and we sense
that what we say is fearfully important.
In order to get at an answer to Jesus' probing question, "But who do you
say that I am?" let us consider the matter under two headings: Jesus Christ
as the Son of man, and Jesus Christ as the Son of God.
I. The Son of Man
It is striking to note that Jesus-before asking, "But who do you say I
am?"-raised the question, "Who do men say that the Son of man is?"
(Matthew 16:13). Thereby He designates Himself "the Son of man." Later
in this same narrative Jesus twice uses the title again for Himself. "For
the Son of man is to come with his angels in the glory of his Father.the Son
of man coming in his kingdom" (Matthew 16:27, 28). Hence whatever might
and ought to be said about Jesus as the Son of God (as in Matthew 16:16) does
not replace the name and significance of Jesus as the Son of man.
The name by which Jesus almost invariably calls Himself in the New Testament
is "the Son of man." He applies this name to Himself over eighty times-so
commonly as to be almost overlooked.
"The Son of man came not to be served but to serve." "Foxes
have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man has nowhere
to lay his head." "The Son of man came eating and drinking."
"After two days the Passover is coming, and the Son of man will be delivered
up." And so on, again and again. There is no need to multiply references.
To open one's New Testament to almost any page in the four Gospels is to find
this self-designation of Jesus as "the Son of man."
It is therefore regrettable that we so seldom use that title for Jesus. It
was the phrase that came naturally to Him, one that expressed His complete identification
with all humanity. It is interesting to note that the disciples never raised
a question about the title, for doubtless it seemed to them to fall so easily,
so properly, so truly from His lips.
Centuries before, the phrase "Son of man" (without the article the)
had been used frequently in the book of Ezekiel as a title of address by
God to the prophet-"Son of man, stand upon your feet.Son of man, I sent
you to the people." (Ezekiel 2:1, 3, and thereafter some ninety times in
the book). The phrase in Ezekiel is a way of expressing the prophet's humanity
and His identification with other people. Other passages such as the familiar
words of Psalm 8-"What is man that thou art mindful of him, and the son
of man that thou dost care for him?"-show that the phrase is another way
of saying "man."
This backward glance at the Old Testament makes it clear why the disciples
probably never gave a second thought to Jesus' calling Himself "the Son
of man." For, unmistakably, there was never in their minds any question
of His complete humanity. They were all sons of men; so was He.
In light of that fact it seems strange that one of the early heresies in the
church denied that Jesus was really a man. This heresy was known as Docetism.
It vigorously affirmed that Jesus was God and only God, and that He just seemed
to be human.
What a vast departure from the New Testament! For nowhere, especially in the
Gospels, is there any question of Jesus' real humanity. The disciples lived
with Him day by day. They ate with Him, they walked with Him, they slept with
Him, they saw Him weep, they watched Him pray. Surely He was man-man through
and through.
Now let us examine that title again, "the Son of man," and note the
significance of the article the. Ezekiel was addressed as "son of
man"; Jesus refers to Himself as "the Son of man." This
may at first seem of no particular import. Yet surely it is, for it says something
about Jesus' humanity that can be said of no other man: He was the man-man
fully and completely as God intended man should be!
In Genesis man is spoken of as being made "in the image of God."
And yet man, from Adam on, ceases to image the divine, because his sin mars
the image. Man made to love God and his neighbor disobeys God (Genesis 3), and
soon thereafter is destroying his brother (Genesis 4). Man becomes therefore
inhuman, or subhuman, and it is only when Jesus Christ appears in the world
that man once again is truly man, truly himself.
Recall for a moment the scene of Jesus standing before Pontius Pilate wherein
Pilate says to the crowd, "Here is the man!" (John 19:5). One senses
that it is not Jesus on trial, but Pilate; for here is manhood supreme that
judges and shames all other men. "Here is the man!"-man who
alone of all mankind has never turned aside from doing God's will, regardless
of the cost; man who alone of all mankind has never ceased to love His neighbor,
be he friend or foe. "Here is the man!" Behold Him whose eye is undimmed,
courage undaunted, sacrifice unlimited-yes, to the very end.
This is the "second Adam," who does not fall, who not eat of the
tree of the knowledge of good and evil. There is no sin in Him coming from the
tempter's lure. Indeed, it was not easy, for He likewise was tested and tried
by every wile and subtlety. Yet always He remained firm. Unlike Adam He constantly
obeyed the Father's command-and so until death was perfect in obedience, perfect
in faith, perfect in love. Even His worst enemies could find no real fault in
Him.
In the words of the poet:
O man's best Man, O love's best love,
O perfect life in perfect labor writ,
O all men's Comrade, Servant, King, or Priest-
What if or yet, what mole, what flaw, what lapse,
What least defect or shadow of defect,
What rumor, tattled by an enemy,
Or inference loose, what lack of grace
Even in torture's grasp, or sleep's, or death's-
Oh, what amiss may I forgive in Thee,
Jesus, good Paragon, Thou Crystal Christ?
(Sidney Lanier, "The Crystal Christ.)
"Man's best Man," "Crystal Christ"-man who shows us the
wonder of what it is to be truly human, who gives us the perfect pattern. Jesus,
the Son of man-that we each might be a son of man living like
Him to the glory of God and the service of all others.
Let us then never fail to stress the importance of the humanity of Jesus. For
until He came, there was no paragon, no example, no man as God would have all
men be. There was no one who lived life in all its possible abundance and fullness
and joy. But now that He has come, we have a Guide, a Pioneer, a Leader, whom
to follow in His teachings and His example is to know life that really endures.
Of course, there is self-denial and sacrifice in it, for did He not say, "If
any man would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and
follow me" (Matthew 16:24).
But in that very self-denial is liberation from bondage to self; in that very
sacrifice to the cross is the joy of a new life being resurrected from the dead.
II. The Son of God
To recognize Jesus as "the Son of man" is of great significance for
what has yet to be said. For it is against this background that He raises the
all-important question: "But who do you say that I am?"
The disciples have already replied to His first question, "Who do men
say that the Son of man is?" that "Some say John the Baptist, others
say Elijah, and others Jeremiah or one of the prophets." In other words,
Jesus was unquestionably a prophet and among the greatest-if not the greatest-in
the eyes of the people. Jesus was a human being, but also a prophet, which,
by definition, means a spokesman for God.
Then comes that piercing question, "But who do you say that
I am?" And by that very question two things are implied: first,
the answer others are giving is not adequate; second, it is highly important
that they speak for themselves. Thereupon Simon Peter replies for the disciples,
"You are the Christ, the Son of the living God" (Matthew 16:16).
The answer, as given in Matthew, is unmistakable. Though Jesus is the Son of
man and among the mighty prophets, He is much more. He is also the Messiah,
and as the Messiah is the Son of God.
Let us hasten to observe that what Peter said about Jesus as the Christ is
quite amazing. For though many people hoped for a Messiah, they never went beyond
thinking of a Son of man, of the line of David, who would restore His people
to power and prosperity. They never thought of Him as somehow also "the
Son of God." Indeed, so imbued were they with the Old Testament teaching
"Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord" (Deuteronomy 6:4) that
to consider the Son of God was hardly possible. Yet here is Simon Peter,
nourished on the Old Testament, saying, "You are the Christ, the Son of
the living God."
If such is amazing, let us note further: Jesus, the humble Son of man, does
not rebuke Peter as if he were indulging in fantasy. Rather does Jesus reply:
"Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jona! For flesh and blood has not revealed
this to you, but my Father who is in heaven." No rebuke-indeed, that comes
later when Peter wants to restrain Jesus from the cross-no rebuke, rather a
blessing.
Jesus Christ is "the Son of man"-and continues so to be as
the rest of the narrative unfolds-but at the same time He accepts the testimony
that He is "the Son of God." And the latter, He adds, only comes by
revelation from above; "flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but
my Father."
Unfortunately there have been people since the beginning of the Christian era
who have been unwilling to accept Jesus as the Son of God. (We have already
mentioned the Docetists who, contrariwise, would not accept Him as the Son of
man.) Others, from disbelieving Jews to so-called liberal Christians, have not
wanted to admit Him to be the Son of God. The Jew has often been unwilling to
accept Christ's divinity because it seems to deny the unity of God; the liberal Christian, because it seems to deny the unity of man.
How can Christ be the Son of God and God still be one? the Jew asks. How can
Christ be the Son of God and at the same time man? the doubting liberal
wants to know. In both cases the divinity of Christ seems to be unreasonable.
Hear this: That is exactly the way it is bound to be, for according to
Jesus Himself, this truth goes beyond reason. This fact of the divine sonship
comes by revelation instead.
Hence whenever a person says, "I cannot accept the divinity of Jesus Christ
because it doesn't make sense," it only shows that he is making reason
his final guide rather than revelation. He is therefore making what he thinks
more important than what God's revelation discloses.
Furthermore, this also betrays the fact that Christian experience has not gone
very deep. Those who knew Jesus only casually, as did the multitudes, could
go no farther than calling Him teacher or prophet. But for those who were closest-His
own disciples-there was the growing realization that He had to be more than
any human category could express.
Of course there were the "mighty works" (or miracles) that He sometimes
did, but miracles were not any real proof of His divinity. For had not Old Testament
prophets done mighty works too-Moses and the parting of the Red Sea, Elijah
and the fire from heaven consuming the offering of Israel, Elisha and the raising
of the Shunammite's son from the dead, and many others? Miracles were no proof
of divinity. Nor did Jesus ever perform a miracle to prove His identity. Indeed,
they were always done to meet human need.
Did they then believe He was divine because He told them so? No, not
basically. As already noted, He consistently referred to Himself as "the
Son of man" and not as "the Son of God."
The answer is that it was neither mighty deeds nor self-attestation that revealed
the deeper secret of His nature. The revelation rather came through His life,
His person, and what they felt happening to themselves in His presence. Of course,
they knew that He was a man, essentially as human as any one of them. However,
a change began to occur in their lives that only God could bring about. They
knew their sins had been forgiven-a thing only God can do; they felt a love
and compassion far beyond any man's capacity; they began to feel new life stirring
in their hearts that only God can bring. Truly He was man, and yet there was
something else: somehow God was there too.
Down through the centuries people have been finding the same thing true about
Jesus Christ. You may begin by following Him as only a man, but if you stay
with Him long enough He finally gets hold of you. Someday, like doubting Thomas,
with all doubts gone, you fall at His feet saying, "My Lord and my God"
(John 20:28).
Let one further thing be underscored: the belief that Jesus is the Christ,
the Son of God, is not only life-changing for the individual; it is also the
very rock on which the Church is founded. For did not Jesus say in the
words that followed Peter's confession of faith, "On this rock I will build
my church and the powers of death shall not prevail against it"? We must
never then allow this rock to be shifted by the skepticism of any age-else the
Church will be confounded and the powers of death will surely prevail.
Let us end as we began. The one question in life of supreme urgency is not
"Who do men say that the Son of man is?" It is rather the next question
of Jesus, "But who do you say that I am?" Can you not only
say, "O man's best Man," but also, "You are the Christ, the Son
of the living God"? If so, then come the wondrous words of Jesus in reply,
"Blessed are you!" And you are on your way-part of the true
Church of the living God, with Him to live and abide forever! Amen.
Content Copyright ©1999 by J.
Rodman Williams, Ph.D.
| Chapter 1 | Chapter 2 | Chapter 3 | Chapter 4 | Chapter 5 | Chapter 6 | Chapter 7 | Chapter 8 | Chapter 9 | Chapter 10 | Top |
|